Issue link: https://cp.revolio.com/i/989729
22 ista views • May 2018 • www.ista.org Due to the potential limitations and safety issues related to the mid-test measurement setup, it was not possible to measure the offsets for each layer and for each Face. Consequently, only one offset value was measured for each tilt angle. A single marked case with the highest measured pre-test offset value regardless of the Layer and Face was used for the mid-test offset value measurement. Evaluation of Stability of Unit Loads for Tilt and Shock Events During Distribution > CONTINUED FROM PAGE 21 Tilt Angle Layer Tilted Face (Face 2 or Face 4) Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Replicate 3 Stacking Pattern AABBAA 5ͼ Top 5.08 5.72 7.62 Middle 6.35 3.81 6.99 Bottom 3.18 3.18 6.35 10ͼ Top 11.43 10.80 7.62 Middle 10.80 10.80 9.53 Bottom 5.72 4.45 8.89 15ͼ Top Failed Failed Did not attempt due to prior failures Middle Bottom Stacking Pattern AAAABB 5ͼ Top 9.53 5.08 9.53 Middle 6.35 5.72 6.99 Bottom 6.99 4.45 6.99 10ͼ Top Failed Failed Did not attempt due to prior failures Middle Bottom Table 5: Post-Test Offset Measurements (cm) 200 Larkin Drive, Unit H • Wheeling, IL 60090 • 847.520.4343 • www.advanced-labs.com THE PULSE OF YOUR PROJECT Need package, material or product testing? The professionals at Advanced Packaging Technology Laboratories keep their fingers on the pulse of your project. They monitor every phase so it never skips a beat. Environmental Testing UN/DOT HazMat Package Testing ISTA / ASTM Package Testing Materials Testing Foremost Testing Facility – Vibration tables – Compression tables – Tensile testing equipment – Shock tables – Drop testers – Environmental chambers Customer-centric Experience – Partner with customers to understand company goals and objectives – Packaging professionals through every step of the packaging process – Deliver projects on-time and on-budget – NEW On-line Quoting Tool makes quoting process effortless