Abby's

Volume 2 Issue 6

Issue link: http://cp.revolio.com/i/412680

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 15 of 47

GMO L a b e l i n g I t's been only 20 years since the first genetically modified (GM) crop hit the market and, my, how the landscape has changed. By 2012, 88 percent of the corn and 94 percent of the soy grown in the United States were genetically modified, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Approximately 90 percent of U.S. canola and cotton, 95 percent of sugar beets, and most of Hawaii's papaya products are GM. While many of the genetically modified organisms (GMO) are not directly used for human consumption, the Grocery Manufacturing Association estimates that about 70 percent of processed foods (soups, crackers, condiments, etc.) contain GM ingredients. GM Fairy Tale? GMOs are created through gene splicing, which merges DNA from different species, creating combinations of plant, animal, bacteria, and viral genes that cannot occur in nature or in traditional crossbreeding. Most GMOs are bred to withstand direct application of herbicide and/or to produce an insecticide. When GM crops were introduced, the public was told they were the answer to world hunger. e theory was that if plants were genetically modified to resist herbicides and pesticides, they would thrive while their natural enemies perished, leading to increased yields. e jury remains out on whether GM crops deliver higher yields. "e Union of Concerned Scientists' 2009 report Failure to Yield is the definitive study to date on GM crops and yield," reports the Institute for Responsible Technology. "e study concludes that genetically engineering herbicide-tolerant soybeans and herbicide-tolerant corn has not increased yields. Insect- resistant corn has only marginally improved yields." As pesticide use increases, so does concern about food safety. French researchers found that the Roundup components (glyphosphate and POEA) in GM corn combine to stress cells. In the study, rats fed GMO corn for longer than they typical 90-day GMO testing period experienced cancer, organ damage, and early death. e study received an onslaught of criticism from GM supporters, was retracted, and then was republished in 2014 with the same results, including the raw data. Until we know more about the long-term safety of GMO crops on human health, on wildlife, and on the environment, it makes sense to limit consumption of Taste for Life By Lisa Petty, ROHP Page 16 | Abby's Magazine - www.AbbysMag.com

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Abby's - Volume 2 Issue 6